The theme of “Meeting Maung Maung” is never to judge someone
based on your own preconceptions because you might discredit who he is. It isn’t
until the very end of the essay that Iyer finally learns enough to trust Maung
Maung and realizes that he genuinely cares for people. The descriptive language
Iyer uses to show the clash between his skepticism and Maung Maung’s innocence drives
the two apart in terms of their perspectives on the world. Iyer candidly
describes himself as a cynic while he captures Maung Maung’s goodness in his friendly
responses to his comments. I also think the language Iyer uses to describe his
first impression of Maung Maung, “torn white shirt above his lungi, and an
open, rough-hewn face,” make Maung Maung seem like a typical solicitor. By the
time the I finished the essay, the same descriptions he used seemed less
threatening, which proves that perspectives can be misleading.
No comments:
Post a Comment